Gamblers and psychology

Posted by Johnmix on January 12th, 2023

A few years ago, an idiot at Harvard University in the United States published a paper claiming nonsense. As a result, he produced a volume of literary outpourings that can only be defined as follows. Ad caveat ad Nauseam. And, citing NGISC (National Gambling Effects Research Commission) issue 꽁머니 gambling data, 1.5% to 15%, but about 2.5%, but they seem to disagree with either. be. According to the survey itself, the proportion of problem gamblers would be closer to 0.85%. But then which of the three versions of the NGISC report are you referring to? One-of-a-kind?

Religious right-wing hard sell?

He later likened compulsive gambling to the type of dopamine addiction found in cocaine users who are constantly seeking highs. He cited clinical studies that appear to show increased blood flow to dopamine-producing areas of the brain. This increased blood flow provides an addictive "euphoria" (quote by me). This is due to the repetition of a certain pattern of behavior in humans, which produces an increase in this sensation, in this case dopamine in that area of the brain, and seeks out activities that reproduce it.

According to the authors, this is what attracts 꽁머니 casino players and is the root cause of gambling addiction. This is also why casino players become addicted to gambling. This psychiatrist should pick a lake, strip down to his underwear and jump in. Pavlov's dog experiment demonstrated this over 135 years ago.

What's wrong with that?

There is always some percentage of animals predisposed to exhibit a particular pattern of behavior, regardless of the behavior taken by other species. This is a basic truth. Studies show that of the more than 167 million people in the United States, less than 1% of them have a condition called "addiction to gambling." However, it does not prove that it is a fact, and even if it is accurate to some extent, it is statistically and sociologically insignificant.

The assumption that such individuals inflict economic losses to society in excess of billion not only pushes this argument beyond the bounds of any reason, but also the "costs" caused by such a small fraction of individuals. ” is greatly exaggerated.

According to the author of that particular article, there are only about 5 million people in the United States who suffer from what the author of this article calls a "clinical gambling addiction." Are these 5 million people really costing society more than billion?

Sharpen your senses and smell the gold

Even if the claim is justified, it is the author's own admission that the gambling business is responsible for about 6 in economic income annually. And in modern times, there may be more. Given this, the disproportionate "cost" of billion is indeed a small "glitch" in the economy. No self-respecting economist or seasoned gambler would see such things as having any meaningful relevance in the big picture.

The idea that some people tend to behave in certain strange ways that psychologists always deem "wrong" is a straightforward, simple, and honest statement of reality. . For example, if I decide to participate in "Live Monopoly", my actions are the result of my own decisions and choices. what is the problem with that?

Even video games have a certain kind of strategy. So is the online version of Monopoly called Live Monopoly, a game where a little planning can lead to some really big wins. Check out some of the big wins posted on Monopoly Live. It should be understood that "wrong" is a relative concept. What you consider "bad" may be perfectly acceptable to others, or to cultures at different points in history.