George Will: Blinded By Science Of Environment Change

Posted by Donald on January 31st, 2021

More doom and gloom about climate modification, it's all over. Unfortunately, the environment change ship is going down quickly with it's ever increasing passenger load and de rigeur status. Yawn. Now before you call me batty, I have no objection to either the concept or the truth of climate modification. No arguments there. It's taking place. For the record though, there is an alternative.

War and other imbalances in the human living experience do not end through diplomatic procedure and settlements. , if that were possible we would have been able to end all war numerous years ago..

Although pacts like the KYOTO PROCEDURE have been signed, lots of researchers and economies still believe that the changes in our environment are not due to Worldwide Warming, they still think that there is no point in acting against the environment crisis. Now what is intriguing is that, according to them, if we do something about it versus the Climate Change and we then come to understand that the change was not due to Worldwide Warming then it will result in excellent anxiety in the economies of the world which will result in mass poverty, joblessness and subsequently will result in fantastic variation amongst the mass. NOW THAT'S BAD. ISN'T IT? Of course it is. Who would want their nation to enter financial anxiety and hardship and leave no scope for individual growth and progress.

War is a disagreement that has escalated into physical reaction. That dispute is a matter of thought. , if you modify the thinking of every individual involved the war might end naturally and right away..

Let's state there was some natural worldwide occasion that will take place such as an asteroid striking the earth or a sudden shift in the orbit of the global challenges earth. If the approaching consequences were so dire that every guy, woman and kid on this planet remained in hazard I question that any war effort in any geographic place would hold extremely much significance to the combatants.

I think this argument misses the point. The point of conservation should be for preservation's sake, Why must people be dealing with destruction before we do anything about cleaning our environment? Isn't less contamination for less pollution's sake sufficient? should not we attempt to recycle our waste and reuse products like plastics and metals instead of simply burying them underground? Doesn't it make more sense to ditch an old cars and truck melt down the steel & plastics than to just mine for brand-new resources?

Is there anybody reading this short article that is not knowledgeable about what occurred to a "little" community called "New Orleans"? This is just a sample of the disasters that will be in the future if we do not do something about it.

Nature operates in cycles. Climate modification is natural. The environment will continue to alter, getting warmer, getting cooler, whether we like it or not. We are not so all-powerful that we can manage the weather condition.