Cartridge Clash - .270 Win Versus 6.5 Greedmoor

Posted by Marktaylor on April 5th, 2021

The .270 Win. Has achieved international acceptance by sportsman because of the mild demeanor and fatal possible. Using bullets out of 100 to 150 sausage, it unites flat trajectory with medium recoil. Velocities can top 3,000 fps having a 140-grain bullet without pushing limits, also since the cartridge dipped in the 1920s, it has always remained a popular hunting Hybrid Cartridges.

Unlike its parent\'s cartridge, the 6.5 Creedmoor gained fans in a rush. While it had been a contest cartridge by design - mating long, high-BC wind-bucking bullets using a short, efficient case and very low re - that the 6.5 Creedmoor immediately became a cross over hunting cartridge.

There\'s a wonderful deal of overlap between the .270 and 6.5 in the area. The Creedmoor utilizes fish from 95 to 160 sausage, the .270 using bullets from 100 to 150 grains, so you will find more options with all the 6.5.

However, the .270 Win. Has an edge in terms of sheer energy and speed. Can easily top 2,900 fps and may also break 3,000. But the extra rate and energy requires greater powder, a more action, and the outcome is a thicker gun which produces more energy.

Muzzle velocity is only one aspect of a capsule which can perform at longer ranges, though. You also have to look at a bullet\'s ballistic coefficient, and also the 6.5 Creedmoor gets got the upper hand . Even the 129-grain Horny Inter Bond 6.5 bullet includes a BC of .485 compared to the 130-grain .270 Inter-Bond\'s .460; the 140-grain 6.5 SST\'s.520 B C out-shines the 140-grain .270.

SST\'s figure of .495. That equates to wind drift, and the lengthy, heavy 6.5

Bullet\'s large heeled density usually means that a Greedmoor bullet meant for hunting may penetrate deep to drop game. The Creedmoor is also a masterfully effective cartridge design. With 140-grain bullets that the 6.5 Creedmoor accomplishes 2,700 fps with 42.3 grains of Hybrid 100V powder or 42.8 grains of Winchester 760.

It\'s less expensive, so, to reload the Creedmoor, atleast concerning powder consumption. And although the .270 Win. Is barely to be considered a heavy-recoiling around, it generates about 15 per cent more recoil than the demure 6.5 Creedmoor, in addition to more muzzle burst.

Just about any center fire ammunition manufacturer supplies at least one load to the .270 Win.; the exact same can not be said for your own 6.5 Creedmoor-at not yet. Additionally, just about any bolt-action rifle made offers a .270 variant, although manufacturers such as Savage and Browning are adding rifles chambered at 6.5 Creedmoor every year.

In case the cartidge\'s trajectory persists, maybe it\'s widely accessible the long run as the.270, but for the minute the Winchester cartridge remains the ubiquitous option. In terms of use on deer-size game, both these capsules will operate perfectly well to longer ranges.

On larger game like elk, the .270 Win. Has the advantage. In the event you believe that the adage that it will take 2000 ft.-lbs. Of energy to kill a bull, then after which a .270 conveys that amount of energy with most heaps to about 300 metres where as the typical 6.5 Creedmoor load drops below that number between 100 and 200 yards.

If you never hand load, the .270 might be a far better option only because rifles and ammo are everywhere. Should you hand load, then you can take advantage of the vast array of 6.5 bullets. The main point is these two cartridges will serve you well, and it\'s really impossible to hang on the term\"loser\" on either one.

.270 WIN.

HITS

Better performance at moderate ranges

Extended track record on sport

Huge ammo, rifle selection

MISSES

Requires longer activity, heavier gun

Generates more aerodynamic than the 6.5

Not as great component bullet choice

6.5 CREEDMOOR

HITS

Short-action rifles and non recoil

Exceptional BC and SD figures

Increasingly more gun, ammo options

MISSES

Much less effective on elk-size game

Ammo still not widely accessible

Prospective not carved in stone

For More: See Here