Welcoming Change Whilst in the Realm of Agile Software Development

Posted by Snedker Sellers on April 21st, 2021

One of the most difficult principles of Agile Software Development to actually implement is the principle of welcoming change. Two of the statements of values in the Agile manifesto are: Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan Both of these statements lead to the idea that Agile Software Development welcomes changes from customers along with other stakeholders in the project. The Software Development team aims to assemble feedback by developing frequent releases through developing the software in some iterations. A person, changing their minds concerning the requirements of a project, isn't viewed as a problem, and this can be in sharp contrast to what sort of lot of methodologies approach the topic of requirements changing. This incorporation of feedback and customer involvement is an important contribution to the success of Agile methodologies as it results in the development of software that customers really want. Following this principle is not any easy task as the application of this principle must start at the very beginning of a project. Guides to implementing Agile Software Development frequently mention the role of the executive sponsor, along with other business oriented roles within a company which have to buy-in and support an initiative to introduce Agile Software Development. But in a Software Development company that develops bespoke software directly for customers, the business enterprise people in the company need to understand and adhere to the principles of Agile Software Development likewise. There may be support for Agile Software Development in a project of most members but the general perception amongst the people is that it's one area which the developers do, and will not directly concern them. As much of the material on Agile Software Development does specifically concern Software Development teams, that is quite an understandable assumption to make. In a company developing bespoke software, your client needs to be made alert to the type of an Agile Software Development project, and a contract has to be negotiated that is appropriate for the chosen methodology. And it's really the business individuals who are associated with a project that usually contain the responsibility of setting the customer's expectations for a project and negotiating the contract. Customers not really familiar with Software Development expect that whenever negotiating a fresh project with a Software Development company that the process is quite like purchasing almost every other goods and services. Your client explains what they want, they agree a price as well as a delivery date, and the client then waits for it to be achieved. THE PROGRAM Development company will not want to challenge these expectations for worries of making a customer uncomfortable, and potentially losing their business. remote patient monitoring integration This often leads to a binding agreement that mirrors these expectations. The customer continues to expect that the software, by the release date, will probably be ready and do everything the client wants, and they only need to wait. However it is inevitable that the client will have to provide feedback on the software and you will be very keen to make some changes. In the aforementioned scenario the client is going to find themselves giving their feedback at the same time towards the release date if they actually get to start to see the software. These changes are unlikely to be very welcome to the Software Development company at this time. Used these requests for changes results in friction between your customer and the program Development company, possibly bringing about arguments between the company and the customer. The business will think that these requirements wasn't specified originally once the contract was signed and demand additional cash to implement these changes. If the customer agrees, a new contract will need to be negotiated. On the other hand the company may consent to do these changes for free given that the customer is without a doubt quite upset that the program does not do what the customer wants. The more regularly these changes are handled free of charge; the company gets nearer to generating a loss on the project. In both these scenarios, the project will be late. If the development team itself is trying to be Agile and is developing the project in iterations, the case is frequently improved through getting feedback from the customer earlier on in the project. But if the contract remains to function as same, these changes will still be unwelcome to the business people linked to the project. They will be seen as a supplementary expense and the developers will be instructed to extend enough time on making these changes until a new or revised contract could be negotiated. Once the business people perceive that changes will undoubtedly be happening between iterations and that this needs addressing, they ought to recognise that a new approach is going to be required in future to make new contracts with customers. An effective option they might choose is to make an effort to break down the 'development' of the project into separate, ready planned phases and then make this the substance of the contract. This approach doesn't challenge the customer's expectations of being certain of the results of a project, and so it appears just like a safe option. In the beginning of a project, a person is frequently quite positive that they know what they desire to. In practice, actually seeing and using the software might probably make the customer consider the project in much more depth than that they had previously. This phased method of making contracts is not going to solve the issue of welcoming changes and introduces new problems. When the first phase of the project completes, the client gets to utilize the software for the first time and starts making requests for changes. As a consequence the next phase will have to be planned again. If the original phases were time estimated then the next phase will require a fresh estimation from the development team. And the business enterprise people will have to develop a new contract for the next thing. Normally, this process will demand a big administrative overhead for relatively small amounts of work. The customer may also be likely to get impatient over the length of time it takes just to get some more work done. More steps need to be taken to effectively develop in a iterative fashion. In an ideal scenario, individuals setting the customer's expectations for the project could have bought in to the concept of Agile Software Development and grasp the principles involved. They might have the responsibility of also convincing the client of the benefits and negotiating a contract that is effective with their chosen methodology. Three typical customer expectations will be challenged during this process: that they already know exactly what they want that they can be certain of what to expect at the end of the project that the program Development company is exclusively in charge of the success of the project To convince the client that developing the project the Agile way may be beneficial; the benefits should be emphasised: That they can change their minds if they want, when they want Their changes will undoubtedly be incorporated directly into their application quickly with minimal administrative overhead They will not have to wait long to see their changes in the software The application developed will be what they need it to be not now but what they need on the release date They will have an important role in guiding the development of the project throughout its development There are of course trade-offs for these benefits: The customer can't be certain what they are certain to get at the finish of the project when signing the contract The criteria for the success of the project changes with time and can not be stated explicitly in the contract as an in depth specification The customer must take an enthusiastic role taking part in the project. The project's success all hangs on on the potency of the collaboration between the customer and the Software Development team. The customer must prioritise their changes, choosing which ones are developed first and which ones have to be dropped when necessary A compatible contract will not state a detailed project plan, and make that plan a binding agreement for the Software Development company. General, higher level requirements will be used as the success criteria for the project. In return the contract will enable the customer to request changes to the project once the customer really wants to. A formal definition of how changes are handled will be contained in the contract. This definition will match the methodology utilized by the Software Development team. With most Agile methodologies this will mean that the development team will incorporate these changes within the next iteration following the change request from the client. The contract will also not contain specific time estimations for higher level requirements. It will instead contain an iteration schedule. A contract that welcomes change is a contract that does not need to be changed. While the process described is called change, this term doesn't accurately describe the all that is taking place. A changing business environment can motivate changes in requirements but what is happening most often is the creation of new ideas for the software from both customers and the development team. It is portion of the creative process that makes the software and it is definitely something that ought to be welcomed.

Like it? Share it!

Snedker Sellers

About the Author

Snedker Sellers
Joined: April 21st, 2021
Articles Posted: 1