Overview

Posted by Saim Khan on June 8th, 2021

HOLDINGS: [1]-Plaintiffs' appeal of a trial court's order denying their postjudgment motion seeking an interim judgment awarding them ,000 in fines, plus attorney fees, was precluded because the order was entered after a consent judgment, which was not appealable; [2]-The order denying plaintiffs' motion was not an appealable order after judgment because it did not relate to the underlying judgment, given that the motion did not attempt to enforce the consent judgment that resulted from the settlement agreement between the parties, but instead sought to determine whether defendant had breached the agreement. The civil litigation lawyer will protect you from business litigation and civil litigation.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed.

HOLDINGS: [1]-Plaintiffs' appeal of a trial court's order denying their postjudgment motion seeking an interim judgment awarding them ,000 in fines, plus attorney fees, was precluded because the order was entered after a consent judgment, which was not appealable; [2]-The order denying plaintiffs' motion was not an appealable order after judgment because it did not relate to the underlying judgment, given that the motion did not attempt to enforce the consent judgment that resulted from the settlement agreement between the parties, but instead sought to determine whether defendant had breached the agreement. The civil litigation lawyer will protect you from business litigation and civil litigation.