The second alleges failure to state reasons on reliefPosted by hwaia mehar on January 27th, 2016 The second alleges failure to state reasons on relief as the crime of attempted fraud against INPS configured on the basis of fictitious withholding the dependency ratio of the applicant as a farm laborer such as MR that the existence of that crime would be established on the basis of a mere deduction 70-247 practice test of the court of appeal since it is not deductible contrary to the findings in the contested judgment the content of a conversation intercepted communications between the M and Ta. where It states the applicant was not mentioned and this without considering that in any case the crime in question was to . Like it? Share it! |