Which is Better for Developing dApps: BSC or Solana?

Posted by Micck Davis on September 23rd, 2022

To take advantage of the benefits of decentralization, businesses are experimenting with the intriguing world of cryptocurrencies and dApp development. The underlying technology that underlies decentralized platforms has an impact on the usability, security, and general degree of user enjoyment of decentralized applications and goods. Blockchain is the fundamental technology that aims to provide decentralization, security, and scalability to established systems when discussing cryptocurrencies and dApps.

Recently developed Layer 1 (also known as L1) blockchain promises unbreakable security, a strong and adaptable design, and quick transaction throughput. For a substantial period of time, Ethereum has dominated the market as the blockchain network that is most suited for the creation of decentralized apps. Each of the possibilities currently competing for Ethereum's attention has advantages and disadvantages. In one of our writings, we recently discussed some of the primary distinctions between Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain (also known as BSC). We'll evaluate Solana and BSC side by side in this blog to see which is most appropriate for dApp development.

How does the Binance Smart Chain foster an environment that is favorable to the creation of DApps?

Binance released Binance Smart Chain in September 2020, just as the competition among blockchain networks for high transaction throughput was about to start. High scalability, low transaction costs, quick block times, quick transactions, and support for smart contracts are all features of the fully developed blockchain network.

Basic Binance Smart Chain Verifiers Components

There can be a total of 21 validators. If they have more BNB at stake, anyone can participate in the transaction as an active validator.

Jogging various chains together

Users can convert their USDT, ETH, or BUSD to BSC using a bridge that BSC constructs using the Binance Bridge. This guarantees seamless compatibility, making BSC dApp development typically the best option for organizations.

Creating Consensus Mechanism

By reducing the number of validators and implementing DPoS and PoA consensus processes, the blockchain was able to achieve dramatically lower transaction costs and noticeably greater transactions per second (TPS).

How does Solana want to establish a favorable environment for the growth of decentralized applications?

Solana has been one of the most used tier 1 blockchain networks since its introduction in 2017 due to its excellent scalability, startlingly fast transactional speed, unbreakable security, and dependability.

Characteristics of Solana

Framework for Agreement

The Proof of History (PoH) consensus technique on the blockchain platform uses a number of computational procedures to confirm the amount of time that has passed between two occurrences. With this protocol, precise transaction recording is assured. In order to ensure robust security and stability, the network also leverages Tower BFT to implement the PoS (Proof of Stake) mechanism.

Construction without States:

Solana is a better network for dApp development services since applications don't need to remember the state of the blockchain, which results in less memory usage and quicker transaction speeds.


Decentralization is kept while the network makes sure everything runs well. To reach a consensus on a certain transaction, a substantial number of validators is necessary. Further evidence of the currency's extraordinary defense against attacks comes from the fact that more than 75% of the $SOL tokens are staked at the time this blog post is published.

Create a decentralized application on your own.

Comparison of BSC and Solana in Detail

Now that we've briefly discussed the two blockchain networks. Let's now discuss a few crucial elements that will enable us to contrast the creation of decentralized applications on the two blockchains side by side.

Scalability and Time Blocks

The scalability of both blockchain networks is very good. However, there are considerable differences between them in terms of block timings and transaction throughput. According to BSC Scan, the network's typical block time is three seconds. According to daily transfer data, BSC handled 62.4 transactions per second with a network usage rate of 38.91%. It could thus make use of the entire network and process 160 transactions per second. On the other side, Solana recently approved a block period of 0.610 seconds and 700 TPS. According to the project, the Solana network's capacity can be increased to 65,000 TPS.

The cost of transactions

Transaction costs on both blockchain networks are minimal. The average transaction cost for Solana is 0.000005 SOL, compared to 0.0009348 BNB for Binance Smart Chain.

Centralization, security, and validators

Compare the number of validators necessary to take part in each network's consensus mechanism to compare the levels of security and decentralization between the two competing blockchain networks. Compared to Solana, which has an unknown number of validators, Binance Smart Chain requires the cooperation of 21 validators. Solana is, without a doubt, the winner in terms of decentralization.

On the other side, PoS protocols are used to decide and control the security levels of blockchain networks. It proves that both perform comparably in terms of security.


The information presented above indicates that both blockchain networks may overthrow one another depending on one or more factors. Businesses should decide between BSC and Solana dApp development based on the requirements of their projects.

Like it? Share it!

Micck Davis

About the Author

Micck Davis
Joined: August 26th, 2022
Articles Posted: 23

More by this author