A12 year old says she?s moving to Dad?s house or not visiting her Dad anymore! CPosted by Nunneley Family Law on March 29th, 2018 Based on an increasing number of telephone calls I am receiving lately, there appears to be a public misconception when it comes to the primary residence of and/or visitation with a child who has reached the age of 12 years old. The purpose of this article is to briefly dispel two general myths that parents have about the rights of their 12 year old children.
The trial courts are given wide latitude in determining the best interests of a child[3], and the Texas Supreme Court has articulated a non-exhaustive list of factors that help guide the trial court’s determination of the best interest of the child.[4]
The Family Code provides that a court shall interview in chambers a child 12 years of age or older to determine the child’s wishes as to conservatorship or as to the person who shall have the exclusive right to determine the child’s primary residence.[5] A plain reading of the statute dispels the myth that the legislature has granted the absolute authority to the child to make the determination where the child will reside and that the child’s “determination” is binding on the Court. The legislature has instead chosen to give a child that has reached the age of 12 a voice in the matter and an avenue to inform the Court of the child’s wishes, however, it is still up the Court to determine what is in the child’s best interest and the child’s wishes are only a factor for the Court to consider in making that determination. For example, it’s not hard to imagine that a child may want to live with the parent that has lax rules concerning homework, chores, video games, discipline, bed time, and the list goes on, instead of the parent who makes and enforces rules regarding game time, homework, etc.
In addition to the authority for the Court to interview the child as to where the child wants to reside, the Family Code also provides that a court may interview the child in chambers to determine the child’s wishes as to possession, access, or any other issue in the suit affecting the parent child relationship.[7]
When a child turns 12 and desires to live with the visiting parent and it has been more than one year since the date of the prior order establishing conservatorship and possession, the visiting parent may file for modification of the prior order with a request that the Court interview the child. The Family Code provides grounds for a Court to modify the prior order based on the child’s preference expressed in chambers as to the person to have the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child and that it is in the best interest of the child.[9]. Again the child’s preference is only a factor which does not bind the Court. The statute provides that if the Court finds the child’s preference is in the best interest of the child, those grounds will support a modification of the prior order.[10]
About the Author Stephen C. Farrar is a family law attorney in Texas, licensed in 1992, and is the senior Associate Attorney with Nunneley Family Law in Hurst, Texas. He can be reached at (817) 485-6431.sNunneley Family Law has been helping families in the Fort Worth and Mid-Cities area resolve family law issues for over 35 years. Their team of professionals provides the clarity and focus you need to in resolving your family law matter. [1]Tex.Fam.Code §153.001 (a)(1), (2). [2]Tex.Fam.Code §153.002. [3] Gillespie v. Gillespie, 644 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tex.1982) [4]Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex.1976)(non-exhausted listing of factors indicating a number of considerations which either have been or would appear to be pertinent (A) the desires of the child; (B) the emotional and physical needs of the child now and in the future; (C) the emotional and physical danger to the child now and in the future; (D) the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody; (E) the programs available to assist these individuals to promote the best interest of the child; (F) the plans for the child these individuals ...seeking custody; (G) the stability of the home..(H) the acts or omissions of the parent which may indicate that existing parent-child relationship is not a proper one; and (i) any excuse for the acts or omissions of the parent. [5]Tex.Fam.Code §153.009 (a)(emphasis added) [6]Tex.Fam.Code §153.009 (c) [7]Tex.Fam.Code §153.009 (b) [8]Tex.Fam.Code §153.009 (c) [9]Tex.Fam.Code §156.101 (a) (2) [10]Id. Like it? Share it!More by this author |