IT Matters

Posted by Winnie Melda on April 5th, 2019

In the article, Nicholas Carr posits that IT is going to become obsolete in its ubiquitous aspect will only change if scarcity replaces over the availability issue. The position is incorrect and could even be dangerous since almost all our life spheres regulate via IT thus being replaced from our lives is not an option; only progression is possible. The facts that support the position include the fact that:

  • In his presentation, the plots graphs of electric power, railroad and IT as comparisons. The fact that they all have similar curves should not lead to the conclusion that there has been the commoditization of IT. He uses number of computers to plot the graph, which is not the same as IT (CATALDO, 2014).
  • Another argument holds that Carr sees the problem with IT as being primarily ubiquity that experts refute saying that the ability in the understanding and the use of it is what counts. The aptitude in envisioning new potentialities from IT coupled to make use of the IT content to fulfill the company desires is the primary factor. They further posit that if IT does not provide a competitive advantage, it will be rare for any IT projects to fail  (Reed, 2006).
  • Another argument is that there is a difference between the context and content. Context, in this case, encompasses the commodity stuff and is usually a high percentage of IT. They hold that context can buy anywhere but is the core of what you buy that determines the competitive advantage. For instance, the Wal-Mart supply chain systems encompass the core and are proprietary. The company glued them together and have been getting a competitive advantage from the. The fact is that change occurs fast and that no one can count on a single competitive advantage but should be on a continued innovation in IT (CATALDO, 2014).
  • Nicholas argues that it is difficult in imagining a commodity that could be in comparison to a data byte. The argument against this point is that as people move towards the knowledge economy, IT seizes to be a transport mechanism but a transformational mechanism. The essence is in the transformational potential the user can do with the byte (Reed, 2006).

References

CATALDO, A., & MCQUEEN, R. (2014). Strategic driver or unimportant commodity?. Industrial Engineer: IE, 46(2), 36-41.

Reed, K. (2006). EQUITY and the Problem of Return on IT Investment. (English). IEEE Software, 23(1), 114-115.

Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in Write My Research Paper For Me services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom nursing essay writing services.

Like it? Share it!


Winnie Melda

About the Author

Winnie Melda
Joined: December 7th, 2017
Articles Posted: 364

More by this author