How do different countries define "child pornography"?Posted by eleanor Thompson on May 14th, 2019 There is an endless stream of news about child sex dolls. Different countries hold different opinions on this matter. The Foundation stated that “providing pedophiles with a channel to satisfy their desires can reduce the risk of sexual assault on children.” Executive Director Tommi Paalanen said in a letter: “Sexpo services and international research have shown that through love The virginity provides a channel to satisfy their desires and can reduce the risk of sexual assault on children.” “Sexual dolls are such a channel.” “People who use a lot of money and energy to buy dolls have made what he wants to achieve. The tendency to decide." "So it is important that customs authorities or other people who care about doll actors do not hinder their usability." A Canadian child doll owner who was arrested tried to escape guilt with compelling reasons. He claimed to have bought a child-like sex doll to "replace" his dead son. According to the law, crime is usually classified as possession, manufacture or distribution of “child abuse images”. The definition of “child pornography” is controversial when lawyers do not find real children appearing in videos or photos. But the convicted purchaser stated that this ultimately clearly conforms to Canada’s definition of child pornography. Another child sex doll case in England, England, was sentenced more quickly. An art school student also claims to buy a child sex doll for art research. Of course, such a reason was quickly proved to be an excuse. Like it? Share it!More by this author |