Physical and Pharmacological Ramifications of Marijuana
Posted by Alizashiakh on November 7th, 2019
Cannabis is not just the absolute most abused illicit drug in the United Claims (Gold, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs, 2004; NIDA, 2010) it is in fact the absolute most abused illegal drug world wide (UNODC, 2010). In the United Claims it is a schedule-I substance meaning it's legitimately considered as having no medical use and it's very addictive (US DEA, 2010). Doweiko (2009) describes that not all weed has punishment potential. He thus implies utilising the common terminology marijuana when discussing weed with punishment potential. For the benefit of clarity this terminology is used in this paper as well.
Today, marijuana is at the forefront of online dispensary shipping worldwide international controversy debating the appropriateness of their common illegal status. In many Union states it is now legalized for medical purposes. This tendency is called "medical marijuana" and is clearly applauded by advocates while simultaneously loathed harshly by opponents (Dubner, 2007; Nakay, 2007; Vehicle Tuyl, 2007). It's in this situation so it was determined to find the topic of the physical and pharmacological effects of marijuana for the foundation of the research article.
Deweiko (2009), Silver, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs (2004) mention that of approximately four hundred known chemicals found in the weed flowers, analysts know of over sixty that are thought to have psychoactive results on the human brain. The most well known and efficient of the is â-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. Like Hazelden (2005), Deweiko states that while we realize many of the neurophysical effects of THC, the reasons THC produces these results are unclear.
Possibly the greatest mystery of all is the connection between THC and the neurotransmitter serotonin. Serotonin receptors are among the absolute most stimulated by all psychoactive medications, but many specifically liquor and nicotine. Independent of marijuana's relationship with the chemical, serotonin is only a little understood neurochemical and their supposed neuroscientific roles of working and purpose continue to be primarily hypothetical (Schuckit & Tapert, 2004). What neuroscientists have found definitively is that marijuana smokers have quite high degrees of serotonin task (Hazelden, 2005). I'd hypothesize that it may be this relationship between THC and serotonin that describes the "marijuana preservation program" of achieving abstinence from liquor and allows marijuana smokers in order to avoid painful withdrawal signs and avoid urges from alcohol. The efficiency of "marijuana preservation" for helping liquor abstinence isn't medical but is a sensation I have professionally experienced with numerous clients.
Apparently, marijuana mimics therefore many neurological tendencies of different medications that it's extremely difficult to identify in a specific class. Researchers may place it in any of these types: psychedelic; hallucinogen; or serotonin inhibitor. It has qualities that copy similar chemical responses as opioids. Different chemical responses copy stimulants (Ashton, 2001; Silver, Frost-Pineda, & Jacobs, 2004). Hazelden (2005) classifies marijuana in its own specific class - cannabinoids. The cause of this frustration may be the complexity of many psychoactive qualities found within marijuana, both known and unknown. One recent client I saw could not cure the visual disturbances he endured consequently of pervasive psychedelic use so long as he was still smoking marijuana. This appeared to be consequently of the psychedelic qualities found within effective weed (Ashton, 2001). But not powerful enough to produce these visual disturbances alone, marijuana was powerful enough to stop the brain from therapeutic and recovering.
I have seen that the major marijuana smokers who I work with professionally seem to talk about a commonality of utilising the drug to control their anger. This observation has shown based consequences and is the foundation of significantly medical research. Study has in fact found that the connection between marijuana and controlling rage is clinically substantial (Eftekhari, Turner, & Larimer, 2004). Rage is a safety mechanism used to shield against emotional consequences of adversity fueled by anxiety (Cramer, 1998). As previously mentioned, anxiety is a main purpose controlled by the amygdala that will be greatly stimulated by marijuana use (Adolphs, Trane, Damasio, & Damaslio, 1995; Vehicle Tuyl, 2007).
Neurophysical Effects of THC:
An interesting phenomena I have experienced in virtually all customers who recognize marijuana as their drug of choice is the use of marijuana smoking before eating. That is explained by effects of marijuana on the "CB-1" receptor. The CB-1 receptors in the brain are located greatly in the limbic process, or the nucleolus accumbens, which controls the prize pathways (Martin, 2004). These prize pathways are what influence the appetite and eating routine included in the body's natural survival instinct, creating us to desire consuming food and rewarding us with dopamine once we ultimately do (Hazeldon, 2005). Martin (2004) makes this connection, going out that special to marijuana consumers may be the stimulation of the CB-1 receptor directly triggering the appetite.
Like it? Share it!
About the AuthorAlizashiakh
Joined: June 9th, 2019
Articles Posted: 143
More by this author